A Reply to John Gapper of the Financial Times -- "Wanted: SWF for a meeting in Washington"

John Gapper is the "FT’s (Financial Times) chief business commentator" and his "blog is about business, finance, media, technology and related matters." He posed a key question facing FSI and mortgage firms regarding the increasing role SWF's are playing as investors.

My comment to his questions can be found at: http://blogs.ft.com/gapperblog/2008/02/wanted-swf-for.html#more. It is also contained below. 

Indeed with the SWF’s by some accounts contributing over $100 billion USD during Q4 2007 alone, there is a potential for them to exert undue influence over corporate governance simply due to their opaque management approaches.  However, just like private equity (PE) and hedge funds, not all SWF’s are created equal – hence they should not be judged with a broad brush stereo type that some would like readers to believe.  After all, without their cash as of late, we could be discussing government bailouts of some of the largest and most iconic of FSI institutions.  Lacking a historic reference for judgment with these “SWF bailouts,” we must be cautious but not adopt the protectionist attitude of the nightly media and talk radio shows. 

As an American who has done business globally, many corporate leaders and politicians are ill-equipped to grasp the fundamental shifting of global wealth that is taking place.  It looks to be a permanent change.  The SWF’s are the result of this globalization of not just resources or labor arbitrage, but of productivity, energy reserves, manufacturing, and even political power.  The SWF’s know that America is not a “desolate” or “hollow” economy – we generate somewhere north of $14 trillion per year in GDP even though our deficits are excessive.  The linkage of SWF’s with PE organizations is a step in the right direction, but we need to continually reassess the intent and stakes that are being taken.

So should SWF’s be feared?  No, not yet.  Should American leaders and politicians start asking some key questions?  Yes, but only with dialogue and not via “witch hunts.”  With the U.S. government still distracted with unwinding of the architectonic problems that created the mess in the first place, it is unlikely that they will shutdown the best source of liquidity in a market dogged by monoline rating cuts, Attorney General actions, debenture insolvency,  and a housing market that has yet to find its bottom. 

In 1516, Niccolo Machiavelli wrote, "And one should bear in mind that there is nothing more difficult to execute, nor more dubious of success, nor more dangerous to administer than to introduce a new order to things; for he who introduces it has all those who profit from the old order as his enemies; and he has only lukewarm allies in all those who might profit from the new.”

 

Comments

Influence on the day to day

Well said, Mark.

But ownership is only one dimension to be considered. I have noticed in FT, the Wall Street Journal and Barons, this is where the columnists spend most of their energy, but the real challenges are likely to be far less visible to analysts, at least initially.

I have been fortunate to work with a number of firms that have hired high-level executives from abroad. In general, these professionals bring a new view to management and have often breathed new life into product development, human resource management and even marketing. In some cases, the results have not been as positive as culture clashes have cost the company focus and customers have suffered. Positive or negative, the effects of offshore management on US financial services companies can not be ignored.

As the industry continues to consolidate, new teams will be formed and asked to deliver on aggressive goals. As you have pointed out before, in this blog and in our recent report, executives who lack significant offshore experience will not far as well when these new inter-cultural teams come together. I'd like to see the analysts focusing more on the day-to-day challenges these executives will face as the SWF investors begin to get comfortable in their new Board seats.

=============
Rick Grant
http://www.rickgrant.net
rick@rickgrant.net

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.